What this site is for
It exists to separate what is established about cell and tissue products from what is claimed, and to grade each honestly rather than dismissing the field or endorsing it. That is why the established uses of transplantation are described at length, why a fat graft and a plant extract are given their own entries rather than waved at as unproven, and why every claim is placed in one of four groups with regulatory status reported beside it.
What it deliberately does not do
It does not recommend for or against a treatment, and it does not invite a reader toward an assessment or a consultation. It is not a booking page and it offers no service in relation to anything it describes. It names no brand and no manufacturer, quotes no prices and no cell counts, and does not present a preparation as producing a younger face on the strength of a mechanism.
The facts kept visible
Three facts are repeated wherever they are relevant. Transplantation is established medicine for defined blood and immune conditions. Most cosmetic cell products hold no approval for injection, and a fat graft and a plant extract belong to different product classes entirely. And an unapproved preparation usually cannot be identified, dissolved or removed afterwards, which is what makes the decision different in kind from a decision about a filler.
How the content is reviewed and corrected
Ke He, MD, Deputy Director and Head of Skin & Laser Aesthetics, is the responsible physician. This subject moves on a faster clock than most, because products are launched with a cell claim attached long before the studies that would test it exist, so the review is dated and revisited on a short cycle. If you find something unclear, out of date or wrong, the contact page explains how to tell us, and the correction is made to the page itself.